The digital problem of relationships: Why did you like?

The digital problem of relationships: Why did you like?

“Why did you like ‘that photo?”, “Why did you follow him / her?”
“Send your location”, “You saw me, but you didn’t write” The most common phrases of our social media times, which we often hear either in our relationship or in our circle of friends! This is digital age. OK, What about relationships? Are they going to be digital? Psychiatrists explain that digital problem!

As of the mid-90s, the internet entered our lives; it can be said that the gradual shell change in most areas of our lives also affects the way of living relationships. Starting with chat programs; With the increase in dating sites and social media channels, we observe that romantic relationships starting in this way are also increasing.

In the new romantic relationships; people can spend a lot of time studying the profiles of their new partners. Ultimately, considering the possibility that the social media profiles of the newly met person may be far from the actual state of the new person; it will prevent any disappointment.

The digital problem of relationships: Why did you like?

Jealousy cause to “LIKE” someone else!

With the digitalization of the relationship; it is seen that the transition from concrete to abstract concepts causes confusion in some couples. For example; Although it depends on the nature of the relationship and the content of the sharing, while the partner’s like like lam sharing of someone else can be considered sosyal normal sosyal on social media, the result of this behavior may be fights due to jealousy between the couples and the photos / shares of each other. some couples may argue if they do not like it.

Some people; he may be obsessively following who his friends are with, who he is following, who he likes to share, and who he is getting out of. This situation both shows a trust problem in the relationship and affects the future of the romantic relationship negatively.

Some correspondence programs allow couples to share their current situation instantly for couples who are not together. However, however, the personality structure of one of the parties and the behavior of controlling the other, shaped by the problem of trusting the other (where you are, what are you doing, take a photo, send a position, see my message, was blue tick, but did not answer, etc.) as a result, it can be quite aggressive for the relationship.

The digital problem of relationships: Why did you like?

Don’t care of others

People in the vicinity of the couples, based on the use of social media again, ”together with their photos have been deleted, followed each other, each other has had shares with each other and reproach, so they can leave in the absence of comments such as couples can make comments. If this does not reflect the reality, they may be demoralized and wear out the existing relationship.

Each person’s personality is unique and special. Therefore, each behavior has its own reason. There are many different reasons why a person may change his / her social media profile. Interpretations outside the relationship are also perceptions of the commentators’ own inner worlds. Therefore, when there are relationships formed by bringing together two different people, people should be more careful if they make comments from outside.

The digital problem of relationships: Why did you like?

uh4>Do not “stalk” your ex

After the end of romantic relationships, the former partner’s social media accounts still “stalk “‘la,” “blocked me?” With the idea of ​​different accounts to follow the person’s own life will cause a significant loss of time and energy for some people, after separation the mourning process that occurs when the partner leaves his / her life may become more complicated.

Therefore, if you are not sure that you have forgotten your ex-partner after separation, it would be more appropriate not to continue to follow him / herself, to avoid obsessively investigating your subsequent relationships and to open new doors to your life.

Visits: 43